iopclubs.blogg.se - Virus barrier vs clamxav

Virus barrier vs clamxav mac os x#
Virus barrier vs clamxav archive#

This includes, but is not limited to Adobe Reader XI, Apache OpenOffice, CCleaner, Firefox, GIMP, Google Chrome, iTunes, Java Runtime Environment, Libre Office, Opera, Picasa, Raw Therapee, Safari, Skype, Thunderbird, Virtualbox, and VLC media player."

Virus barrier vs clamxav mac os x#

"We perform an on-demand scan while installing and using the top 100 products for the Mac OS X platform. The 2015 report explains how AV-TEST engineers check for false positives: If false positives appear regularly, users will ignore both false positives and real warnings. No false positivesĮngineers at AV-TEST understand that false positives are the bane of the antimalware industry. The only antimalware that had detection rates less than 88% was the security package from ClamXav, detecting 39.6% of the malware threats. The report stated that Avast, Avira, Bitdefender, Kaspersky, and Symantec had 100% malware detection. Morgenstern said, "However, we excluded archives as such formats are not scanned by all products."

When the initial test run was finished, the engineers checked for application updates if any were available, they were installed and the application was tested again to see if the updated version detected samples missed earlier. DMG or PKG)."Īs for the actual tests, engineers performed on-demand scans of "native" malware, Potentially Unwanted Applications (PUA), and Potentially Unwanted Programs (PUP) samples, including scripts.

Virus barrier vs clamxav archive#

Morgenstern added, "There may be archive files included in the test set, as long as the specific malware is distributed that way (e.g.

"During the creation of the test set, we selected the most recent samples from several different malware families." "All samples are confirmed to include malicious functionality," explained Morgenstern. To be realistic, care was taken in creating the test set of more than 160 malware threats.

The versions available at the Mac App Store appeared to be limited in functionality." Testing for malware detection Maik Morgenstern, one of the company's CEOs and technical director, mentioned, "We only tested downloadable products offered at the AV vendors' websites.

All product versions were cross-checked with the developer's website (when available) to ensure that we had the latest product version and updates installed (before the start of each test).

Each product was installed and ran on the test system individually.

All test systems were connected to the internet, so the products could reach their respective cloud and reputation services.

All products were installed on identical iMacs with a 2.7 GHz Core i5 CPU, 16 GB memory, and a 500 GB SSD hard disk running OS X 10.10 (Yosemite) with recent updates.

One reason to pay attention to AV-TEST reports is the willingness of company management to publish, in detail, the procedures used during the testing.

Intel Security/McAfee Internet Security.

The 2015 report starts out with good news, "While the first test of OS X security solutions in 2014 revealed that many products had massive problems in malware detection, the results in the 2015 test were significantly better." AV-TEST just released its 2015 survey, Mac OS X under attack - 10 security packages put to the test. Seeing an emerging trend, AV-TEST GmbH, an independent IT security and antivirus research house, started testing antimalware products for Apple in 2014, Mac OS X in the Crosshairs - 18 Malware Scanners Put to the Test. Just yesterday, my friend's Apple notebook caught some new form of ransomware and is completely locked up. Microsoft operating systems may soon have competition as the most popular malware targets, because the bad guys are making serious inroads with Apple products.